More relying on off-farm income

The following information related to income of farm families is from a December, 2005 Statistics Canada news release:
For the first time since 1990, families with relatively large farm operations relied on off-farm sources for more than half of their total income—joining the ranks of families with small- and medium-sized farms who have relied on off-farm income for the majority of their income for several years.
Families operating Canada’s largest farms now are the only ones that continue to rely on farm sources for more than half of their total income.
Families operating small farms (that is, those with revenues from $10,000-$49,999) consistently have relied on off-farm sources for most of their total income.
Between 1990 and 2003, the percentage of total income from off-farm sources ranged from 87.1-92.6 percent.
Families operating medium-size farms (with revenues from $50,000-$99,999) also have relied on off-farm sources for most of their total income.
From 1990-2003, medium-size farms have grown increasingly reliant on off-farm income. For instance, off-farm income represented 66.3 percent of the total income of these families in 1990, but 90.0 percent in 2003.
For families with large farm operations (i.e., annual revenues from $100,000-$499,999), the portion of total income from off-farm sources also has grown steadily.
In 1990, for example, 37.3 percent of their income came from off-farm sources. But by 2003, that number had risen to 52.1 percent.
Families with the very largest farms (with revenues of $500,000 and over) are the sole exception to the trend. The proportion of these families’ annual incomes from off-farm sources has remained relatively stable, ranging from 25.9-33.5 percent since 1990.
In 2003, average total income of farm families operating large farms declined for the second time since the beginning of the data series in 1990.
The drop occurred because the 1.8 percent increase in average off-farm income and the 39.6 percent jump in average net program payments were not sufficient to offset the 42 percent drop in average net market income.
Among the main factors behind the drop in average net market income were back-to-back droughts in 2001 and 2002, and the closure of the U.S. border to live cattle exports after the diagnosis of the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in a cow in northern Alberta in May, 2003.
Once adjusted for capital cost allowance, average net market income of farm families operating large business-focused farms dropped to a deficit of $6,843.
Other factors behind the drop in net market income include higher expenses for fertilizer and lime, pesticides, custom work and machine rental, machinery fuel, machinery repairs, licences and insurance, and higher net interest expenses.
< *c>Dates to remember
•Feb. 9—FCC Farm Succession Planning Workshop, Stratton Millennium Hall.