Sickness benefits demand spikes

The Canadian Press

OTTAWA–More and more Canadians are applying for federal help as they take time away from work to battle serious illness–and almost four out of every 10 applicants are maxing out their benefits.
Since 2015, demand for sickness benefits under the federal employment insurance program has reached a 10-year high, with more than half of successful applicants taking 10 or more weeks’ worth of payments.
The figures, contained in a recent report to Parliament, show more than 142,000 people used their maximum allotment of 15 weeks in 2017, an increase of about eight percent from the previous year.
The most recent report on the EI system for the fiscal year ending March, 2017 found the duration of benefits increased with age, with those over 55 using an average of 10.5 weeks of benefits.
There aren’t any scientific studies on the people who rely on sickness benefits to provide a definitive explanation about what is fuelling the increase in demand, said Donna Wood, an expert on the EI system from the University of Victoria.
Nor does there appear to be many demands for changes even as demand increases, she noted.
Since 2015, the Liberals have changed eligibility rules for regular employment insurance benefits, extended parental leave to 18 months without adding any extra money, created five weeks of optional leave for non-birthing parents, and expanded the scope of compassionate care leave.
But sickness benefits thus far have not been targeted for any major changes, leaving it as the only one of the so-called special EI benefits that hasn’t received a Liberal makeover.

The federal department overseeing the program is scheduled to conduct an evaluation on the benefit this fiscal year.
NDP jobs critic Niki Ashton said the fact so many people are using up their benefit is evidence the 47-year-old program needs an update.
“We’ve heard from folks with heart-breaking stories about the stress that comes with having to be right back at work, or be back at work when you’re still not well,” Ashton said.
“This is a benefit that is there to support people in getting better, rather than contributing to them becoming worse off.”