Pension bill still alive and kicking

With the new session of Parliament in full swing, I’d like to give an update on Bill C-501, which is still making its through the legislative cycle.
There have been some recent developments in regard to the bill and the way forward has become clearer in recent days.
Despite some erroneous media reports, Bill C-501 is, in fact, alive and well—and is continuing its journey through Parliament.
On occasion, the parliamentary process can be quite complex and it would seem that a few media outlets have misunderstood the impact of some recent developments. I just wanted to clarify first, and above all else, that C-501 will, in fact be heading back to the House for a final vote sometime this spring.
Some of the confusion about the status of C-501 came with the defeat of a motion in the House of Commons that related to the bill. I realized there still was some opposition among primarily Conservative MPs, but also Liberal, to the idea of putting pension plans ahead of banks and large financial institutions, so I put forward a motion that could have enabled a compromise amendment to be negotiated between our parties.
In short, I asked the House of Commons for permission to amend C-501 at the Industry committee so that pensions and severance pay would be placed in the middle of the list of creditors during restructuring and bankruptcy proceedings instead of at the very front, which the bill sought to do in its original form.
Unfortunately, this motion was defeated but the bill itself remains alive and has not been impacted.
The type of motion I tabled is known as a “Motion of Instruction,” and it required the unanimous consent of the House of Commons in order to pass. The motion itself only would have allowed the negotiation process on C-501 to begin and empowered the Industry committee to make a compromise amendment if it so desired.
Putting pensions behind banks, but ahead of all other creditors, seemed like a common sense compromise and could have made it easier for many Conservative MPs to support the bill since it would have shielded the big banks from any and all fallout that could occur as a result of them being bumped down a notch in the list of creditors and being placed behind pension plans.
However, instead of allowing a compromise to be negotiated in the Industry committee, the Conservatives refused to grant their approval to the negotiation process and rejected the very idea of working together on the issue.
This regrettable decision by the Conservatives was not shocking, but it was disappointing.
While my efforts to work with the other parties to reach a compromise on C-501 essentially were killed by the Conservatives, the bill itself is still very much alive and kicking. C-501 was scheduled to be examined for a final time at the Industry, Science, and Technology Committee yesterday (Feb. 15).
There were to be some minor amendments made to the bill to clear up some language issues, but I’m not expecting any significant changes to be made to its content.
Once this last committee meeting is over with and the final version of C-501 is returned to the House, there must be two further hours of debate and then a final vote at what is called “third reading.”
The two hours of debate are likely to occur in March or early April, with the final vote expected in early-to-mid April. In this final vote, the support of the Liberals will be crucial to getting C-501 passed and moved to the Senate.
If the Liberals show up and support this bill, and agree to put the interests of pension plans and retirees ahead of banks and primary lenders, then the bill will move to the Senate, where a new battle begins against those unelected and unaccountable Conservative senators.
But we’ll cross that bridge when it comes.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Posted in Uncategorized