Enbridge plots next steps after Northern Gateway gets federal nod
CALGARY — Enbridge Inc.’s controversial Northern Gateway proposal passed a key milestone on Tuesday, but the Calgary-based pipeline giant says it has a long-way to go before it decides to break ground.
Ottawa gave the green light to the multibillion-dollar Alberta-to-West Coast project, subject to 209 conditions recommended by a regulatory panel late last year.
Enbridge CEO Al Monaco described the economic case as “straightforward” for a pipeline that would connect growing oilsands crude with eager buyers on the other side of the Pacific.
But he acknowledged that’s not enough to proceed.
“If we can’t prove out safety and environmental protection on these projects, the economic benefits won’t matter,” he said in a conference call with reporters.
“In other words, the economic benefits alone are not enough to sustain public support.”
Enbridge will be working to meet the panel’s conditions — more than 100 of which must be met before shovels can even hit the dirt — during the next 12 to 15 months. The earliest possible in-service date would be 2018.
He said Enbridge won’t put off building the pipeline indefinitely, but it’s in no hurry to give it the final go-ahead either.
“We’re not going to be driven by our calendars or watches here. We’re going to take this one step at a time,” said Monaco.
On the call, Monaco touted the slate of pipelines it has in the hopper to connect Alberta crude to eastern and southern markets.
The good news, some observers say, is that Enbridge has time to look westward.
“There is some flexibility on timing to ensure that it’s done right,” said Greg Stringham, with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.
CAPP predicts that oilsands production will hit 4.8 million barrels per day by 2030, about two and a half times higher than last year’s output of 1.9 million barrels.
At that point, the capacity of all pipelines currently proposed will be needed, said Stringham.
Jack Mintz, with the University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy, said demand from new markets isn’t going to diminish.
“There’s huge Asian coker demand for oil and I think that demand is not going to disappear,” he said.
“In fact, the Asian market is actually the growing market for oil products and there is a very big demand for Canadian oil.”
Laura Lau, a senior portfolio manager with the Brompton Group, agrees the window of opportunity should stay open for some time, given the rate at which oilsands production is expected to grow.
“We still need as many pipelines as possible, so perhaps it would be past the end of this decade,” she said.
However, Lau believes other pipeline proposals to the south and east, such as TransCanada’s Keystone XL and Energy East, have a much better chance of going ahead than Northern Gateway, given the First Nations and political challenges that are specific to British Columbia.
Enbridge’s most recent estimates put the price tag of the project at $6.5 billion, but the company has said costs are sure to go up. The joint review panel’s report pegged the cost at $7.9 billion, including $500 million for marine infrastructure.
“The ultimate question is whether the pipeline just becomes way too expensive to build,” said Dylan Jones, with the Canada West Foundation.
“And if there’s something that kills it, it’s going to be a combination of the challenge of building support in British Columbia and the cost.”
Jones praised the “humble” tone Enbridge’s leadership has been taking lately on Northern Gateway and that he’s optimistic the line will ultimately be built.
“It has never been good for Canada to be so dependent on the United States,” said Jones. “Even if we secure a good access through the East Coast, there’s still going to continue to be a strategic imperative for Canada around accessing the Pacific in a cost-effective way.”
The Joint Review Panel set December 31, 2016 as a deadline for Enbridge to start building the project, unless the National Energy Board says otherwise.
Follow (at)LaurenKrugel on Twitter